Menu
  • Chapters
    • Intro
    • Contents
    • Foreword
    • The Cases
    • Disclosure of Information
    • Media Coverage
    • Impact and Consequences
  • Download PDF
    • English
    • Bulgarian
    • Greek
    • Italian
    • Spanish

Disclosure of Information chevron_left

As politics follows and responds to the social dynamics, political parties tend to use criminal cases that have gained popularity to promote certain points and objectives of their party programs with the aim of attracting voters during a political campaign. A relevant example is the case of Manolis Kantaris murder. A far-right political formation used the case in its campaign, characterised by propaganda of fascist ideas, nationalism, and violent demonstrations. The fact that the accused persons of the murder were from Afghanistan and Pakistan was used to incite hatred and intolerance towards foreign nationals living in Greece. The culmination of events was the organisation of riots that injured dozens of migrants and even caused the death of a young migrant from Bangladesh. Similarly, in Italy, a public outcry emerged over the murder of Pamela Mastropietro where the accused was a Nigerian national. The case was broadly covered by the media and had a strong societal impact. It has led to two major consequences: a xenophobic raid and an exploitative use of it during the political campaigns for the forthcoming general elections in 2018.

Impact on social processes and the broader political situation

Politicians, especially far-right and far-left parties, may use highly publicized criminal cases for short-term political gains although it entails lengthy negative effects as enhanced stereotypes, marginalisation and division between social groups.

The case of Katerina, one of the cases of HIV positive women made an impact going beyond the personal lives of the accused women and their families, to Greek society at large and even at the international level. The case is characterised with a serious violation of the right to privacy and medical confidentiality of a vulnerable group of HIV positive women. The solidarity movement that emerged in support of the accused women involved international and national organisations, together with a large part of the population and human rights institutions as the Ombudsman. A wide public debate unfolded on the delicate balance between disclosure of information made on the grounds of public health concerns and the protection of fundamental human rights such as human dignity founded in the European legal civilisation. Part of the debate focused on the role of the media and its practices for delivering such information to the public. The Association of Editors of Athens condemned the publication of photographs by newspapers, TV channels, and websites, which “contributed to the public humiliation of certain women, violating blatantly the code of ethics and the professional morality of journalists”. Furthermore, the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS) issued a press release expressing its concern over the actions of Greek authorities involving the arrest, detention, mandatory HIV testing, publication of photographs and personal details, and the pressing of criminal charges against the women. In addition, the famous case was analysed from a political perspective. The women were arrested within an operation for combating the “the increased AIDS rates due to illegal prostitution and illegal immigrants” launched by the minister of health. The analysis indicates that citizens who criticised the illegal disclosure of information by public authorities considered their actions a “pre-electoral witch hunt”. This demonstrates that the presumption of innocence, among a number of other rights, might be violated as result of pursuing political objectives.

Lastly, social media and networks provide platforms for many people to express their opinion on current events, including criminal proceedings exposed in media, and even to form activist movements and groups. Movements organised through social media usually expand rapidly. It is noteworthy that social networks create a favorable environment for the expression and dissemination of radical views, including such pertaining to the two sides of a criminal case – the offense or the defence. The more people are involved, the more influence and social pressure on the legal process is imposed. The cases studies show that social movements may take the form of hashtags, groups, discussions, etc. The conviction for sexual abuse in the Herd case instead of one for rape aroused great indignation that was translated into social media campaigns through hashtags such as #noesno or #yositecreo. There were 466,864 posts on Twitter related to the conviction only in three hours.

The criminal cases that attract high attention in media may bring certain issues onto the public and political agenda. The examined case studies provided indicative examples of the impact on society and the political processes in the respective countries. Some cases that touch upon existing social problems, such as migration, discrimination, or radicalisation, usually disturb the public and generate turbulent reactions that can evolve into raids, protests, and demonstrations. That was observed in the murder of Manolis Kantaris at Athens city center where the accused persons were foreign nationals. In light of the then topical issue of immigration in the country, the memorial march organised by the local community to honour the victim turned into a protest against the growing number of immigrants in the district whose presence instilled insecurity and fear among the locals.

Online media and social networks provide platforms for expressing various, sometimes radical, views. The authorities and media should cautiously consider what information to publish online. Once posted on the internet, it is nearly impossible to be completely deleted later.

The first demonstration was of an Italian citizen who was strongly affected by the murder case and decided to take the law into his own hands by opening fire on a group of random dark-skinned individuals of African descent. In the moments following his arrest, the perpetrator stated that his initial intentions were to go to court and murder the accused person for the Pamela Mastropietro case, but he changed his mind and decided “open fire at random black people.” Later it was revealed that the shooter was involved in a right-wing political party that criticised and condemned immigration and actively contributed to the politisation of the issue in

Italy. Immigration was a central topic of the general elections campaign and the case study analysis pointed out the process of securitisation of the issue of migration and the exploitative use of the criminal case during the campaign. Far-left politicians used the case to spread the message that illegal immigrants are an existential threat to society and promised to adopt extraordinary and arbitrary measures, such as the repatriation of 600,000 illegal immigrants. Subsequently, the election results showed a rise from 0.69% to 17.4% of the votes for the far-left compared to the previous elections. Furthermore, the accused person for the Sotirya murder case was of Roma ethnicity and the case was used by Bulgarian far-right political parties to gain political benefits. The perceptions of Roma people as criminals is particularly widespread among Bulgarians. Politicians from a far-right political party, VMRO, spoke publicly about the murder case not only to strengthen such stereotypes, but to incite tension and division between ethnic Bulgarians and Roma communities. Members of VMRO also made the radical proposal for amendments of the Penal Code to introduce chemical castration to people sentenced for pedophilia. There is no information whether an official proposal was submitted to parliament, so it could be assumed that these statements sought to attract the support of voters that may find the radical measures appealing. Another example could be found in the sexual harassment in the Herd case where the public outrage provoked by it was also translated into numerous demonstrations throughout the country, which were publicised and supported by the main left-wing political parties, including the ruling party at the time - PSOE. In response to the public resentment, the left-wing party publicly announced its intentions to reform the Spanish Criminal Code in the section on crimes against sexual freedom and sexual indemnity by introducing harsher penalties.

chevron_right
Page 20 of 23«‹1819202122›»

Assessing the Risk of Isolation of Suspects and Accused (ARISA) is a project to investigate the consequences to people’s personal lives when accused in committing a crime.

EU

This website was funded by the European Union’s Justice Programme (2014-2020).

The content of this Website represents the views of the author only and is his/her sole responsibility. The European Commission does not accept any responsibility for use that may be made of the information it contains.

STAY IN TOUCH

 

Facebook   Research Gate

© Copyright - Arisa
  • Privacy Policy
  • Legal notice
  • Imprint
Communication Guidelines for Criminal Justice AuthoritiesThe Presumption of Innocence and the Media Coverage of Criminal Cases Scroll to top

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies.

OKLearn more

Cookie and Privacy Settings



How we use cookies

We may request cookies to be set on your device. We use cookies to let us know when you visit our websites, how you interact with us, to enrich your user experience, and to customize your relationship with our website.

Click on the different category headings to find out more. You can also change some of your preferences. Note that blocking some types of cookies may impact your experience on our websites and the services we are able to offer.

Essential Website Cookies

These cookies are strictly necessary to provide you with services available through our website and to use some of its features.

Because these cookies are strictly necessary to deliver the website, refusing them will have impact how our site functions. You always can block or delete cookies by changing your browser settings and force blocking all cookies on this website. But this will always prompt you to accept/refuse cookies when revisiting our site.

We fully respect if you want to refuse cookies but to avoid asking you again and again kindly allow us to store a cookie for that. You are free to opt out any time or opt in for other cookies to get a better experience. If you refuse cookies we will remove all set cookies in our domain.

We provide you with a list of stored cookies on your computer in our domain so you can check what we stored. Due to security reasons we are not able to show or modify cookies from other domains. You can check these in your browser security settings.

Google Analytics Cookies

These cookies collect information that is used either in aggregate form to help us understand how our website is being used or how effective our marketing campaigns are, or to help us customize our website and application for you in order to enhance your experience.

If you do not want that we track your visit to our site you can disable tracking in your browser here:

Other external services

We also use different external services like Google Webfonts, Google Maps, and external Video providers. Since these providers may collect personal data like your IP address we allow you to block them here. Please be aware that this might heavily reduce the functionality and appearance of our site. Changes will take effect once you reload the page.

Google Webfont Settings:

Google Map Settings:

Google reCaptcha Settings:

Vimeo and Youtube video embeds:

Other cookies

The following cookies are also needed - You can choose if you want to allow them:

Privacy Policy

You can read about our cookies and privacy settings in detail on our Privacy Policy Page.

Privacy Policy
Accept settingsHide notification only